News & Events
"Today [September 4, 2014] the Urban Institute and the Rockefeller Foundation released an evaluation of the first phase of Rebuild by Design. The evaluation explores how the Rebuild by Design competition, an initiative of President Obama's Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Task Force, was designed, carried out, and could be replicated in other contexts.
Rebuild by Design launched in 2013 as an ambitious, unprecedented public-philanthropic partnership to identify opportunities to build physical, ecological, and economic resilience across the region. The winning proposals, announced earlier this year, represent a shift from disaster relief and recovery, which traditionally focuses on restoring communities to a pre-crisis state. Instead, these proposals reflect an approach to building resilience – championed by The Rockefeller Foundation – that engages designers, scientific experts, and the affected communities themselves to tackle together a set of issues in ways that recognize and anticipate the uncertainty of a future that is not like the past. The Rockefeller Foundation was the lead financial supporter of the competition.
"Rebuild by Design offered the Sandy region an opportunity to develop and invest in innovative and resilient ideas that translate into the difference between communities that will emerge stronger from a storm like Sandy and communities that may never fully recover," said Dr. Judith Rodin, president of The Rockefeller Foundation. 'The lessons we have learned from Rebuild by Design will have tremendous value for other places aspiring to become more resilient in an increasingly complex and volatile world.'
The evaluation revealed that even though the Rebuild by Design competition was limited to the Sandy recovery area, it has the potential to transform the way disaster recovery efforts are designed, funded, and implemented across the United States. The evaluation focuses solely on Phase I of Rebuild by Design, but it demonstrates that collectively communities and decision makers can respond to crises in creative ways and work as a region to become more resilient with adequate resources and knowledge."
Read the rest of this article on PRNewswire.
Despite assumptions in some quarters of widespread academic radicalism, professors are politically liberal but on the whole democratically tolerant and are focused more on the business of research and teaching than on trying to change the world.
Professors and Their Politics is a new book edited by IPK's Visiting Scholar Neil Gross with Solon Simmons. This book tackles the assumption that universities are ivory towers of radicalism with the potential to corrupt conservative youth. Neil Gross and Solon Simmons gather the work of leading sociologists, historians, and other researchers interested in the relationship between politics and higher education to present evidence to the contrary. In eleven meaty chapters, contributors describe the political makeup of American academia today, consider the causes of its liberal tilt, discuss the college experience for politically conservative students, and delve into historical debates about professorial politics.
Offering readable, rigorous analyses rather than polemics, Professors and Their Politics yields important new insights into the nature of higher education institutions while challenging dogmas of both the left and the right.
Copies of Professors and Their Politics are available for purchase here.
Neil Gross is a professor of Sociology at the University of British Columbia and author of Why Are Professors Liberal and Why Do Conservatives Care? and Richard Rorty: The Making of an American Philosopher. He is also a Visiting Scholar at IPK. Solon Simmons is an associate professor in the School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution at George Mason University and author of The Eclipse of Equality: Arguing America on Meet the Press.
Steven Brigham’s abortion clinics keep being sanctioned for offering substandard care. Why is he still in business? IPK Scholar, Eyal Press, reports on how the stigma and shame surrounding abortion enable substandard providers to thrive. Read "A Botched Operation" in the New Yorker.
Illustration by Tomer Hanuka.
The Council of Editors of Learned Journals (CELJ) has named Public Culture the 2013 co-winner of its Phoenix Award for Significant Editorial Achievement, given to journals that have launched an overall effort of revitalization or transformation within the previous three years. The other co-winner was Translation Review, published by Routledge.
The Award was presented on January 11, 2014, at the Modern Language Association conference in Chicago. In their comments at the ceremony, the CELJ jurors had this to say:
Public Culture was already a respected and pathbreaking journal before its major revamp. Starting from a strong base, the new editor has clearly identified a set of changes with a clear and appropriate rationale which provide development upon existing practice rather than a radical departure from it. These new developments are successfully carried out, with a marked emphasis on accessibility and broader relevance. The interviews involve prominent scholars and reflect the broad, interdisciplinary focus of the journal. The style/design of both the print version and the website are excellent and there is a clear intention to reach out to a new audience. The editors show real passion for their mission. Overall, an impressive journal very clearly pitched towars a broad, interdisciplinary, and topical audience.
Read more about the award and Public Culture's response here.